1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

AoS General's Handbook finally announced !!

Discussion in 'Seraphon Discussion' started by Seraphage, Jun 26, 2017.

  1. Aginor
    Slann

    Aginor Fifth Spawning Staff Member

    Messages:
    12,249
    Likes Received:
    20,141
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I tend to say it is just fluff. Making them named would make those bataillons very bad. I am pretty sure with named characters they mean those with names on their warscrolls.

    As for the Carnosaur: yeah it makes it slightly weaker. But not that much I think, those riders do quite some damage themselves. I wouldn't call it a nerf.

    Edit: ...except when buffing knights maybe. But those also became cheaper, so... meh. Could be worse.
     
    Wazz and tom ndege like this.
  2. Nielspeterdejong
    Terradon

    Nielspeterdejong Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    591
    Likes Received:
    514
    Trophy Points:
    93
    So our Oldblood on Carno can't use his Command ability on his Jaws attacks anymore?
     
  3. Jonas Andersen
    Jungle Swarm

    Jonas Andersen New Member

    Messages:
    2
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    3
    the allies that seraphon has is ONLY stormcast eternals, so unless it's an SC unit you pick as an ally, you lose the alliegance
     
    Wazz likes this.
  4. Wazz
    Troglodon

    Wazz Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    629
    Likes Received:
    735
    Trophy Points:
    93
    @Jonas Andersen oh yeah! Thanks for catching my mistake! And I agree them having a name is just for fluff reasons since it isnt oart of their warscroll
     
    tom ndege likes this.
  5. tom ndege
    Skar-Veteran

    tom ndege Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,568
    Likes Received:
    5,173
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Good thing. With Slann being named characters would have been way too bad...
     
    Aginor and Wazz like this.
  6. Aginor
    Slann

    Aginor Fifth Spawning Staff Member

    Messages:
    12,249
    Likes Received:
    20,141
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ok guys I think I may have found something important:

    I just looked up the part about mounts in my GHB2017, I have the German version.
    And interestingly, that paragraph mentions artefacts and command traits (German: Generalseigenschaften), and NOT command abilities (German: Befehlsfähigkeiten). Which also makes more sense to be honest since those pages are about allegiance and traits.
    Command abilities don't have to do much with that.

    So please can anyone post this on Facebook asking for a clarification? Because this might either be a translation error in the German version, or an error in the original English version that was already fixed for the German one (translations often already contain some fixes).

    Fingers crossed for command traits being meant and not command abilities.
     
    Xlanax_lot, Captaniser and Gradeaal like this.
  7. Mune
    Skink

    Mune Member

    Messages:
    32
    Likes Received:
    24
    Trophy Points:
    8
    I would always go with the english version.

    Btw. cant you ask on fb on your own? :)
     
  8. Aginor
    Slann

    Aginor Fifth Spawning Staff Member

    Messages:
    12,249
    Likes Received:
    20,141
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Nope I don't use Facebook. So unless they have other channels of communication I am unfortunately left out there.

    As for the book:
    Normally I would also go for the English version, but I share it with my friends and not everyone can read english that well.
    Besides: The translations are - with very few exceptions - very well done in GW products as far as I can tell.

    Since the chance for this being a typo in the English version is high (command trait vs. command ability) while being very low in German (Generalseigenschaften vs. Befehlsfähigkeiten) and every other paragraph on that page is solely about artefacts and command traits I am actually quite sure that they meant to write command trait and this is an error in the English version.

    Otherwise that would mean that Command Traits can be used for mount weapons, while Command Abilities wouldn't. That's absurd IMO.
     
    tom, Wazz, tom ndege and 1 other person like this.
  9. scubrat
    Temple Guard

    scubrat Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    207
    Likes Received:
    298
    Trophy Points:
    63
    It got posted on here yesterday (page 30), the English version doesn't mention command traits, but does mention artefacts and command abilities. So sounds like a mix up.
     
    tom ndege likes this.
  10. Aginor
    Slann

    Aginor Fifth Spawning Staff Member

    Messages:
    12,249
    Likes Received:
    20,141
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I know, originally I didn't even read that paragraph in my German book, because I had read it here on Lustria.
    I wanted to show it to a friend because it would seriously nerf Orruks (Gore-Gruntas, Maw-Krusha, and all other cavalry units like Savage Boarboyz would not really profit much from the Waagh anymore! Also a serious nerf for many other armies) and that's when I noticed the difference. I looked back at the English version and then back to German and thought: OK, I am SURE the english one is wrong, that can't be true and it doesn't fit the rest of the page.
     
    Wazz and tom ndege like this.
  11. Aginor
    Slann

    Aginor Fifth Spawning Staff Member

    Messages:
    12,249
    Likes Received:
    20,141
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Also fun fact: The Scar-Veteran on Cold One's warscroll is gone from the app?? LOL. They seem to have a few problems with that.
     
    Wazz likes this.
  12. Wazz
    Troglodon

    Wazz Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    629
    Likes Received:
    735
    Trophy Points:
    93
    @Aginor ok cool I am not crazy! I saw that too and was like am I going insane? It was there then poof! Lol. I used him the other night with the blade of realities worked pretty well. Took on 10 wildriders with mystic shield, killed 5 before he went down. Wanderers(Wood elves) are really strong again. Just curious has anyone thought of running double shadowstrike starhosts before?
     
  13. Wazz
    Troglodon

    Wazz Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    629
    Likes Received:
    735
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Maybe they mean just the riders are affected not their mounts? I can see that being fair, sucks for our carnosaur though.
     
  14. GreenyRepublic
    Temple Guard

    GreenyRepublic Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    212
    Likes Received:
    992
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Picking up my GHB pre-order today along with a Skink Starpriest. Because I'm lazy and impatient could somebody fill me in on what the new Seraphon artifacts are?
     
  15. Kadanga
    Saurus

    Kadanga Active Member

    Messages:
    97
    Likes Received:
    158
    Trophy Points:
    33
    I am considering this for a 1500pt game, instead of one unit of 6 rippers I'll have two of 3 that can apply preassure on different parts of the map. I havn't quited boned out the details but I'll make a post of it when I do.
     
    Wazz likes this.
  16. Mark Sinosich
    Cold One

    Mark Sinosich Active Member

    Messages:
    141
    Likes Received:
    244
    Trophy Points:
    43
    Look at page 26 of this thread.
     
    Wazz likes this.
  17. Wazz
    Troglodon

    Wazz Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    629
    Likes Received:
    735
    Trophy Points:
    93
    @Kadanga awesome definitely keep me posted!
     
  18. Nielspeterdejong
    Terradon

    Nielspeterdejong Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    591
    Likes Received:
    514
    Trophy Points:
    93
    So any update? Is the Scar vet on cold one gone?
     
  19. Killer Angel
    Slann

    Killer Angel Prophet of the Stars Staff Member

    Messages:
    15,039
    Likes Received:
    33,084
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Nope, it's still there and it costs 100 pts.
     
    Koriialstraz likes this.
  20. Aginor
    Slann

    Aginor Fifth Spawning Staff Member

    Messages:
    12,249
    Likes Received:
    20,141
    Trophy Points:
    113
    That's not the point. I am...halfway... fine with the artefacts and command TRAITS not affecting mounts' weapons. I am just pretty sure that the wording of that paragraph is wrong since it doesn't mention command TRAITS but says command ABILITIES.
     

Share This Page