Damn that's tough.. Between 1 and 2. While 3 is nice.. the death of a pet is somthing I can live with and already have been through before. As the great Yoda once said, death is a natural part of life. So yeah, and Free food would be amazing and would "save" me alot of money to put into the hobby but I can see it ruin my health drastically when I dont have "food-money" to keep me in check. So think I will go with No Travelling Charges.. I want to go back to the UK again so badly and want to visit Canada and Japan.
That was my choice as well. I have no pets, so #3 is eliminated right from the onset. Free travel would make for a supremely interesting life and I can much more easily afford food.
I went with my instincts and wanted free food for life. I'm assuming this means free quality food. Though I suppose if free travel included a luxury jetliner and limo rides I might have chosen that instead. I don't have a pet but I'm not planning for my pet-lessness to be permanent. However, pets living as long as I did would require someone playing God. Whereas free food or travel merely requires a lot of money.
No brainier - food lol, Must be my biggest expense (above Warhammer of course) Just think of all those extra models I’d have !
I'm assuming that the travelling is just for trips, so I'd go for food. If however no travelling costs also includes the commute to work and such than I'd probably go with that one. When counting the commutes it adds up even faster than when counting foodcosts.
I guess this is for one person not your family unit so Free travel is the winner. Average cost for my food a year £2080 Average cost for my travel per year £4000+
Are you counting the actual stay at the hotels and such as well then? Cuz I wouldn't include that in travel. Just gas/plane tickets/etc.
Food depends on quality. Travel depends on what counts Both of those also depend on whether it is just me or my family as well. Pets... as much as I would love to keep my pet forever, that's... kinda unnatural. I don't want that. So I tend to say travelling. I have to think about it.
I don't travel a lot. So if I wouldn't change anything in my life it probably wouldn't be worth it. That being said: If traveling was free I'd sure travel a lot more.
While 1 and 2 are nice, I would go with three hands down. I had a cat who I grew up with die and it broke my heart. My cats name was Sweetpea and she was the nicest (and fattest) cat you would ever meet. She died from what we think was cancer. Before her death she couldn’t even walk because she was so weak. We now have a new cat buttercup who I love but I wish that I would never have to go through that pain again.
Oh shi- i just realized that if you had godly chickens as pets, you would pretty much have an infinite delivery of eggs daily, making option two irrelevant Gawd DAMMIT
It’s a double edged blade that Number 3 - your pets live as long as you - but just imagine an 80 year old dog/cat etc draggings itself through life with you :S not cool or if it has some eternal youth thing that is somehow attached to your own longivity - that poor pet gets to die as soon as you do - so if your life is cruelly cut short - let’s say a car accident, then your loved ones (if any) have to deal with a double whammy of death - unless you have multiple pets with the knowledge that they would live your lifespan, so your other half and Kid could be sat at home playing happily with a score of ever youthful puppies ‘bam’ truck hits daddio while he’s grabbing some milk, al of a sudden those happy healthy pups just drop dead = one scarred child followed by the knowledge of dad also being whipped out. ;D just saying.